Harvard Business Essentials

It is assumed that this has the answers inside. The solutions and answers will emerge from their own repertoire of capabilities through the language of the question, listening, guidance, support and mutual problem resolution. Difference between Mentoring and Coaching with regard to this issue is raised in the Harvard Business Essentials (2005), that the fundamental difference between Mentoring and Coaching is based on the latter, is related to the work done by the cochaee, and the first with his professional career. To support this claim, it is necessary to review the scope of each of the aspects involved. On the basis of the definition of Coaching as an interactive process by which chiefs and supervisors try solving performance problems or develop capacities of employees. The process is based on collaboration and is comprised of three components: technical help, personal support and individual challenge. These three elements are United by emotional link between the persons involved. In this process the assessment of results often reveals training opportunities.

This is generally accomplished through a four step process: observation, discussion, active training and follow-up. On the other hand, States that a mentor is a person who helps another to experience personal growth through learning. Mentoring, is offering advice, training or guide that makes a person who has experience and skills for the benefit of the personal and professional development of each other. Mentoring aims at supporting personal development through psychosocial and professional functions. Professional functions imply sponsorship, training, protection, exhibition and challenge; It’s very activity in work-related activities. On the other hand, the psycho-social functions is dealing with being inside of the person subject to the actions of the mentor: the way they behave, the values of the workplace, the personal dilemmas and the feeling of acceptance by the group. It is not limited to the development of a limited set of skills or behavior, but that it occupies the entire person and his professional career (p.

The Knowledge

If we open another debate, this time of the gratuity of the information, (because on the Internet seems to indulge in everything, as if the information flow without limits of inexhaustible Springs), other doubts arise as you are going to compete a portal that gives the news with a header of a journal’s prestige for sale to the public that is part of a reading and cultural tradition of a country quality information is not cheap. If your pay, you demand quality. Information also, equivalent to say objectivity. If it is made by rigorous and competent professionals, they should be well paid. A newspaper’s prestige, (some of whose summary pages are read daily on the Internet), cannot have a drafting only Fellows in practices.

Information needs the filter and a highly professional drafting assaying. Even to make bulletin must be knowing how to write with clarity and elegance. The opinion is one thing. The information another. The interaction between the Internet and the press is possible, when the newspaper uses Internet for support and thrives on its more dynamic appearance: interaction with its community of readers and Internet users who provide the grain of sand in your emails in the topics living or more controversial among the news which is published daily. A synergy that makes something alive newspaper; that allows you to press refresh daily with the echo of what we might call the mentidero of its readers; the plaza, the agora where discusses the news in real time.

The network, in sum. Internet has been revealed as a great tool to get the knowledge of libraries, textbooks, of the newspaper libraries of scientific treaties. Popularizing access to the data, facilitating the immediacy of the search, in a revolutionary way. In the same way that in due course the tuner was imposed on other media providing the news to listeners rather than others and in any circumstance and time.