The Man

But all the men do not show that way of relation. In another point, we found the explanation psychological, that is to say, man through the violence expresses his wrath and its anger in front of figures that considers inferiors to him. That is to say, that when considering to his wife inferior it requires to attack it, to only satisfy its wrath. Then, yes it is only the expression of the wrath and the anger, that determines the violence becomes selective. Since the man can socially be an enchantment, but not to which he talks about with his pair. In such a way that the violence because he is iracundo is not justifiable in any sense. The violent forms of expression become more and more complex, when we tried to give a meaning them. Factors of sort and the construction of each society also exist in which to the society it talks about.

But this does not only concern to the men. The women also are subject to those ideas that the society dictates about how to be woman or like being man. To which we in the society are expected of all that was called on to us to live. But these dictations not necessarily are in all the men and all the women of that society. Although one society dictates that the men to be it require to control his wife and to do violence to it so that is controlled. All the men and to all the do not accept it women. In a society men and women accept who it and other exist tolerate that it, but also exists the great range that does not tolerate it absolutely. Then on what he depends that a man becomes violent and he accepts it to a woman? The answer to this question is difficult and contains a great amount of edges to take into account.