As well as the field that is the focus in the social fights for ownership of the land, but in the cities they occur the same: many families are taken off the force of old building and abandoning and forced to live in the marginality. For occupying a territory, territory this that is full of contradictions on the other hand high building of luxury of the other the real disparity the periphery, that many times formed for peasants who had lost its lands and migraram for the great centers. In the field the expropriation of peasants is clear, the territory if transforming mainly for agricultural ways, according to BERNARDO: ' ' Brazil knew an intense transformation in its agriculture in the period of 1965 the 1985. In these decades if dictatorship, the military governments had implanted one politics of development farming for the modernization of the field. This model caused deep transformations, privileging capitalist agriculture in detriment of agriculture camponesa.' ' (MANANO, 1997, p.2) Then he is implicit that the appropriation of the territory for the capital, made with that it had great social transformations in the field, mainly with the peasant, who now would start to be a wage-earner inside of this system, and being used to advantage inside of the proper field for the great large estate owners or as already was boarded migrando for the great urban centers in search of half for its proper survival.
what it goes to result in an accumulation of people without work accumulating itself in the peripheries and slum quarters creating a great number of force of work in many disqualified and cheap times, that many will be used mainly in the civil construction. The MST and the Fight in the Brazilian Territory. They are you continue the transformations in the Brazilian territory, many are agents of changes and the MST is an example of these changes.